Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Will Ferguson wins Canadian literature award

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"46077947","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-141992346", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-141992346", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "46077947", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "46077947" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });

New Zealand Post Workers Win Could Boost Others'... | Stuff.co.nz

FIONA ROTHERHAM AND CLAIRE ROGERS

A Court of Appeal decision over posties' holiday pay could have significant implications for staff working irregular overtime, an employment lawyer says.

The court determined NZ Post was obliged to calculate and pay posties for unrostered overtime when paying them for public holidays, holidays in lieu or leave for bereavement or sickness.

In doing so the court overturned decisions by the Employment Court and the Employment Relations Authority, which had been appealed by the Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa.

Chen Palmer partner Susan Hornsby-Geluk said the ruling would affect any employee who worked irregular overtime, such as police, nurses and people in the service industry.

"The employer has to pay them their average daily rate, which is averaged out over the whole year, as opposed to just what they might have been rostered on to work."

Affected employers could find their wage bill increased "quite substantially", with employees able to claim wages owed up to six years in arrears under the Holidays Act.

"NZ Post is a significant employer with access to good legal advice and they weren't doing it right. I would anticipate there would be a significant number of employers who would not be paying in accordance with this decision."

Jennifer Mills and Emma Warden, partner and senior associate at Minter Ellison Rudd Watts, said the decision would have ramifications for employers and staff but its impact should not be overstated.

The Employment Court ruled that an employee had to establish that they would have worked overtime on the day in question and the amount they would have received in order to be paid for it.

But Graeme Clarke, advocate for the Postal Workers Union, said that was near impossible as in most cases a postie would not know if they had to work overtime until the day itself.

- ? Fairfax NZ News

Source: http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/7884589/Postie-win-could-boost-others-pay

payroll tax payroll tax aisha khan alanis morissette adam lambert incendiary floyd mayweather

Monday, October 29, 2012

Barbecue Secrets Revealed!!!-aft-

Barbecue Secrets Revealed!!!-aft-Click Image To Visit Site"Amazing Secret Finally Revealed by Retired Kentucky Restaurant Owner Eliminates All Guesswork? And Makes Cooking Up ?Practically Addictive? Barbecue Simple!"

If you REALLY want to cook up some killer BBQ, click here for a special *audio* message!

Now you can learn to make everything you grill or barbecue 100% more flavorful almost overnight, getting the perfect results you could only dream of before? while grilling steak after steak, and rib after rib, exactly how you want it, as consistent as clockwork? and, if you?re like most barbecuers, turning heads at your very next BBQ!

If you?ve ever wanted to cook up barbecue so incredible your guests actually close their eyes, make the "mmmmm" sound, and ask the person next to them if they can believe what they?re tasting? then this will be the most important message you ever read.

My name is Randy Pryor, and until recently, I was your basic BBQ "hack." I had a Weber and some tongs, what else did I need?

Sometimes I?d grill up the meat so it was perfect on the outside, but raw on the inside? then the very next BBQ, using the same equipment, my steaks would be fine on the inside and burnt on the outside.

I remember standing over the grill after everyone left, one emotional hair-trigger away from hauling the whole thing to the dumpster and never even attend another barbecue for the rest of my life.

Doesn?t it drive you nuts? I had no consistency to my cooking at all, even after 20 years of barbecuing regularly. No way to tell how "done" the meat really was.

And it wasn?t for lack of trying, either ? I?d easily dropped several thousand dollars buying whatever equipment the "pro?s" suggested at the time. I just couldn?t make it work.

Quite a few years ago, my wife?s grandfather owned a very successful restaurant in western Kentucky (known to many for their killer BBQ).

In fact, it was so successful that, when it was time to finally retire, the sale of the restaurant allowed him to put enough money away so that he and his wife can live "quite comfortably" for the rest of their lives.

About twice a year, my wife (who, at one time, worked in the restaurant) and I would fly back to Kentucky to visit all her relatives.

When I asked her grandfather if he would teach me how to barbecue (I mean really barbecue) he always declined (?something about me not understanding ?cause I was from California.)

Well, after many trips back east, and much arm-twisting, he finally considered the idea of sharing with me the closely guarded secrets of real BBQ?ing ? the secrets he built his restaurant?s reputation on, and the kind of barbecuing that folks talk about for weeks.

But, he did not want these secrets out in the world for "every Tom, Dick, and Harry." And, he was concerned that his town friends would be very upset if this information was just frittered away.

So, I promised him that I would only make this information available to the most serious barbecuers.

Six months later, we flew back. It seemed to me that every time I talked to him about the idea, he grew less and less receptive. So, I dropped it.

He clicked off Jerry Springer, moved the TV tray, rolled out of the lay-z-boy, stood up and left the room. He returned with a shoe box. Then another. Then three cardboard boxes full of notebooks of all kinds.

There were literally hundreds of (what was thought to be long-lost) time-tested recipes, tips, and techniques that have been handed down from generation to generation.

The collected scraps of paper were found in attics, basements and pantries and given to granddad over the years. Often there was no way to know where they originally came from.

But, sometimes the names of the authors, or at least the name of the person writing it down, were scribbled on them. Folks named Aunt Orpha, Eva Nell, Daytha, Grandma Brownie, Bubb, Daddo, and Sweety.

I gave him my word that, as a teacher, I would catalog, research, test, and re-test the whole process before I taught anything to anyone.

And, because he still lives in the same little town in KY, where everyone knows everyone else?s business, I promised him anonymity. He said he didn?t care about all that, "? as long as folks didn?t know who he was."

So, over the past 10 years, I?ve been quietly perfecting a simple step by step fool-proof system for teaching others the REAL art of barbecue and grilling.

"Last week Lisa asked me if I could give her a grilling lesson. First I taught her the basics about preparing our grill for use.

Next I taught her how to make some delicious Barbecue Pork Ribs. She did all the preparations, along with my guidance, beginning with a simple rub recipe and a barbecue sauce I got from Randy Pryor?s "Barbecue Secrets Revealed!"

The end result was an A+ for Lisa. The ribs were tender and juicy with a little heat and great flavor.

Chef Jay, Author of "Grillin? With Heat" www.chile-pepper-sauces.com

"I can?t tell you how many times I?ve recommended Barbecue Secrets Revealed! to my friends! The very first time I tried one of your recipes, my friends were momentarily speechless ? until they begged me for my "BBQ secret." Now, I?m the queen of "Q" in my neighborhood! Thank you, Randy"

In order to avoid total disaster, do you know the 3 most important questions you must ask yourself before you begin any Barbecue?

Do you know the perfect temperature you should be cooking with for the kind of meat you?re barbecuing?

Do you know how to tell when your meat is "done"? (cooked thoroughly, but still juicy, no matter if it?s "rare," "medium," or "well done")

Thanks to an amazing new e-book called, "Barbecue Secrets Revealed! Barbecue Like? Read more?

Related Reading:

NEW, Set of Two (2) 14½-Inch Long, Grill Spatula, Turner Spatula, Barbecue BBQ Spatula, Solid Stainless Steel, Flexible Blades, Riveted Smooth Wood Handle, Commercial Grade, One Perforated Face Spatual and One Solid Face SpatulaNEW, Set of Two (2) 14?-Inch Long, Grill Spatula, Turner Spatula, Barbecue BBQ Spatula, Solid Stainless Steel, Flexible Blades, Riveted Smooth Wood Handle, Commercial Grade, One Perforated Face Spatual and One Solid Face SpatulaThese commercial grade turners feature a stainless steel blade, brass rivets and smooth easy to grip wood handles.

Price reflects a set of TWO.

Length - 14 1/2 Inches
Length (handle) - 4 1/2 Inches
Length (blade) - 10 Inches
Width (blade) - 3 Inches

Source: http://www.womenfavor.com/food-and-drink/bbq-grilling/barbecue-secrets-revealed-aft.html

Time Change 2012 Mockingbird Lane Lena Dunham peyton manning sf giants Hurricane Sandy gold rush

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Obama talks Trump, debates, baseball on 'Tonight'

BURBANK, Calif. (AP) ? What's real estate mogul Donald Trump got against President Barack Obama? The president says it's an old grudge that goes back ? way, way back ? to their childhood days in Kenya.

"We had constant run-ins on the soccer fields," Obama told "Tonight Show" host Jay Leno during a tongue-in-cheek knock on Trump Wednesday night on NBC. "He wasn't very good and resented it. When we finally moved to America, I thought it would be over."

Trump became a leading voice in the "birther" movement, the discredited but very much alive conspiracy theory that Obama was actually born outside of the U.S. and isn't constitutionally eligible to be president. Earlier Wednesday, Trump offered to donate $5 million to the president's charity of choice if he would release his college and passport records.

Wisecracks aside, Obama told Leno that he has never actually met Trump.

When Leno asked Obama if he was glad the presidential debates are over, the president responded, "You know, I was sort of getting the hang of it." Obama, whose performance in the first debate was widely panned, said he didn't do an effective job of energetically outlining the contrast of visions between him and Republican Mitt Romney.

Part of the problem with a debate, Obama said, is that it's not a natural way of communicating ? having an argument with someone as you sit next to him.

"Well," Leno said, "you're married."

Obama shot back: "But the difference is, with Michelle, I just concede every point."

Asked which team he was backing in the World Series, the Detroit Tigers or the San Francisco Giants, Obama managed to get in a dig at Romney: "I will say, I've spent a lot of time in Detroit lately, and I didn't want to let go Detroit go bankrupt. So in this particular World Series, I might be a little partial."

___

NBC is controlled by Comcast Corp.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/obama-talks-trump-debates-baseball-tonight-033852332.html

msnbc jessica biel trump ann coulter minecraft world series ipad mini

Group of major CEOs urges tax hikes, spending cuts

(AP) ? CEOs from more than 80 major U.S. companies are pressing Congress to reduce the federal deficit by raising taxes and cutting spending. The deficit and how to tame it has become a key theme in the presidential campaign.

They warned in a statement issued Thursday that the uncertainty spawned by the deficit, which has topped $1 trillion for four consecutive years, is dampening businesses' hiring and investment and stifling the fragile economic recovery.

The CEOs said the solution requires a combination of higher taxes and reduced government spending including on entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. They also seek federal investment in infrastructure and math and science education.

"What it really comes down to is if we still have the political will to be a great country," Dave Cote, chairman and CEO of Honeywell International Inc., said in a statement.

The CEOs head a diverse array of corporations, including Aetna Inc., Microsoft Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Time Warner Cable Inc., Merck & Co. Inc., General Electric Co., Dow Chemical Co., Verizon Communications Inc., Bank of America Corp., AT&T Inc. and Allstate Corp.

Some members of the group rang the opening bell Thursday at the New York Stock Exchange.

The group endorses the proposals of a special bipartisan commission that called for about $3 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax increases to save around $4 trillion.

Republican politicians and lawmakers have vigorously opposed tax increases. GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney would lower deficits mostly through deep spending cuts and eliminating unspecified tax deductions. He also wants to lower the top tax rates on corporations and individuals.

President Barack Obama has proposed reducing the deficit by slowing spending gradually, to avoid suddenly tipping the economy back into recession. He would raise taxes on households earning more than $250,000 and impose a surcharge of 30 percent on those making more than $1 million.

The deficit, the shortfall created when the government spends more in a year than it collects, currently has the government borrowing about 31 cents for every dollar it spends.

A year-end deadline looms for Congress and the White House to work out a deal on the deficit. Otherwise across-the-board spending cuts and tax increases will automatically kick in, slicing about $100 billion from federal budgets and raising taxes by $400 billion as the nation goes over the so-called "fiscal cliff" in early January.

__

The list of executives and their companies is at http://www.fixthedebt.org/uploads/files/CEO-Fiscal-Leadership-Council-Membership.pdf .

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2012-10-25-CEOs-Reducing%20the%20Deficit/id-e6f10e68aedc45e19a51068b692f02f0

2012 oscars the shore meryl streep oscar wins sasha baron cohen oscars oscar winners the artist sacha baron cohen oscars

Sara Coleridge: Wife of an Opium Eater By Cheryl Bolen | The Beau ...

Samuel Taylor Coleridge was one of the leading poets of the Romantic Movement in England. Yet, it turns out he was anything but romantic as a husband. Today, Cheryl Bolen tells us what life was like for his long-suffering wife, Sara.


* ??????? * ?????? *

When Sara Coleridge, alone and with no attendants, delivered herself of her first son (Hartley) eleven months after her 1795 marriage to poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge, little did she know this was the first of many calamities she would face alone. During the four decades of their marriage STC (as he called himself) never made enough money to support his family, never owned a home, and lived with his wife (on and off) less than six years. Much of the time he lived with her he took to his bed, complaining of various maladies ? and consuming ever-increasing quantities of opium.

In addition to all these abuses, Sara has been unfairly maligned by her husband?s friends and biographers and most unjustly by her husband himself. Her detractors paint her as a shrew and claim the only reason STC married her was because fellow poet Robert Southey urged him to do so in order to embark on a "pantisocratic" society with eleven other couples in the American colonies. Southey was to wed Sarah?s sister Edith Fricker, and fellow Pantisocrat Robert Lovell was to marry another Fricker sister, Mary. (Sara dropped the H from her first name after her marriage to please her husband.)

While it is likely true that STC was not deeply in love with Sara when he proposed, by the time they married a year later, he was convinced of his potent love for her.

In the year of their betrothal, all plans for embarking on their Pantisocratic society fizzled away, but the three couples married anyway. During STC?s and Sara?s betrothal, STC spent many weeks away from Bristol?many weeks in which Sara received no correspondence from her fianc?. His absence must have made her attachment to him more ardent for when Southey fetched him in London and brought him back to Bristol, STC was astonished and flattered over her affection toward him. A true courtship ensued.

"Coleridge assured me that his marriage was ?forced upon him by the scrupulous Southey," said Thomas DeQuincey. "On the other hand, a neutral spectator of the parties protested to me that if ever in his life he had seen a man under deep fascination, and what he would have called desperately in love, Coleridge, in relation to Miss F., was that man."

STC wrote poetry to her and after they married wrote, "On Sunday I was married?united to the woman whom I love best of all created Beings?Mrs. Coleridge?MRS. COLERIDGE?I like to write the name."

Prior to the wedding he and Southey had a falling out. Southey was beginning to understand STC?s "indolence," a euphanism of the day for addiction to laudanum. His addiction made his behavior erratic, made him miss scheduled lectures for which he was being paid, and made him generally unreliable.

A pity Sara was not cognizant of these things before the marriage.

The Coleridge?s first home was a cottage in the village of Clevedon on the Bristol Channel. The rent was five pounds a year. Their first purchase for their new home was an Elonian harp which STC immortalized in a poem by that name. After two days of habitation, the couple realized they could not live by harp alone. Coleridge wrote his printer to request a kettle, carpet brush, mats, candlesticks, pair of slippers, Bible, keg of porter, spices, raisins, currants, a flour dredge, and catsup.

The Coleridges lived in the cottage less than two months. The cottage was too far from Bristol, forcing STC to spend the night in Bristol on days he walked (since he was too poor to own a horse) to the city?s library. Sara disliked spending the night alone in their remote cottage.

They next resided with life-long friend Thomas Poole at Nether-Stowey, where the Coleridges soon leased a cottage nearby. Never one to care about money, STC found himself having to face the reality of providing for his wife and the child she was now carrying. His printer paid him one and a half guineas for every 100 lines of poetry, and Poole secured pledges from Coleridge supporters to give STC a "testimonial" for six years, the testimonial disguising charity.

The cottage, located near Nether-Stowey?s main gutter, sat on six acres and consisted of two living rooms on either side of a dark passage, a small kitchen-scullery in the rear, three small bedrooms upstairs, and an earth-closet privy in the garden. There was no heating except for the open fireplaces which required expensive fuel and cumbersome chopping of kindling. All the cooking had to be done at the open hearth where Sara was forced to lift the heavy iron pots to set on trivets or to suspend them from hooks. Water had to be fetched from the pump, and hot water had to be heated over the fire. Wash day occurred every other week and was an arduous undertaking. A baby necessitated even more washing, and diapers had to be dried on clothes horses set around the fire and a drying rack suspended above the fire. Other chores weighing down Sara were darning and mending clothes and sewing new ones, cleaning house and keeping oil lamps filled.

A list STC drew up to allocate the work reads thus:

Six o?clock. Light the fires. Clean out kitchen. Put on Tea kettle. Clean the insides of boiling pot. Shoes &c C&B (the C for STC and the B for their nursemaid, who soon quit)

Eight o?clock. Tea things and c. Put out and c. after cleaned up. Sara

One o?clock. Spit the meat. B&C

Two o?clock. Vegetables and c. Sara.

Three o?clock?Dinner.

Half past three ? 10 minutes for cleaning dishes

Sara calculated that with economy ? including forgoing meat ? they could live on sixteen shillings a week. This did not prove to be the case. Nor were they vegetarians for long.

At this time 21-year-old Charles Lloyd, the epileptic son of a Quaker Birmingham banker, became enthralled with Coleridge, and his father agreed to pay Coleridge 80 guineas a year to mentor his son, who was to come live with the expanding Coleridge household.

While Coleridge was finalizing these plans with the senior Lloyd in Birmingham Sara delivered the first of their four children.

In addition to taking care of her baby, Sara was now hostess to young Lloyd and nursemaid to her often bed-ridden husband. (Coleridge was already addicted to morphine by the time he was an undergraduate at Cambridge.) STC was an indulgent father. "He (baby Hartley) laughs at us till he make us weep for very fondness," STC wrote. "You would smile to see my eye rolling up to the ceiling in a lyric fury, and on my knee a Diaper pinned."

Ill-health beset STC each fall when the cold weather came, and when he became incapacitated, so did Lloyd, who eventually had to be placed in a sanatorium, leaving the Coleridges quite destitute once again.

It was at this time STC was to begin his association with William Wordsworth and his sister, Dorothy. This relationship would profoundly affect STC for the rest of his life.

It was also the beginning of the end of the Coleridges? heretofore happy marriage.

STC idolized Wordsworth. He thought Wordsworth the only man he had ever met whose intellect he found greater than his own. He developed, too, a keen camaraderie with Dorothy, who was to fall in love with STC, despite that he was a married man. Though his admiration for Dorothy was great, STC was never her lover.

Twenty months after Hartley was born, Sara gave birth to a second son, Berkeley. In between the two births she had suffered a miscarriage.

When Berkeley was just weeks old, STC came into possession of a 150-pound annuity for life from the Wedgwood brothers, Josiah and Thomas. Flush in the pocket, STC decided to study in Germany. Sara and the boys would stay behind, but the Wordsworths would accompany him.

STC left his wife and babies in September, 1798. At first he missed them greatly. He wrote to his wife: "When we lost sight of land, the moment that we quite lost sight of it, & the heavens all round me rested upon the waters, my dear Babies came upon me like a flash of lightning ? I saw their faces so distinctly!" He closed the letter, "Good night, my dear, dear Sara! ? every night when I go to bed & every morning when I rise I will think of you with a yearning love, & of my blessed Babies! ? Once more my dear, dear Sara! Good night."

He kept up a regular correspondence, but did not receive any letter from her. Two months after leaving her, he wrote, "No letters from England! A Knell, that strikes out regularly four times a week?How is this my Love? Why do you not write to me? Do you mean to shorten my absence by making it insupportable to me? Or perhaps you anticipate that if I received a letter, I should idly turn away from my German to dream of you ? of you & my beloved babies! ? Oh yes! ? I should indeed dream of you for hours and hours ? and of the Infant that sucks at your breast, and of my dear, dear Hartley." He wrote the poem "The Day Dream" about his absent wife at this time.

There was good reason for Sara?s silence. Her babe had been at death?s door for weeks, owing to a faulty inoculation against small pox. Little Berkeley, acclaimed by all to have been an exceptionally beautiful baby, developed the small pox all over his body, his eyes, nose and gums. Sara said she could almost see them popping out on him. She had to hold his little hands around the clock to keep him from scratching. "He lay upon my lap like a dead child," Sara eventually wrote her husband, "burning like fire and all over he was red scarlet." He could not even cry, but he made a "horrid noise in his throat which when I dozed for a minute I always heard." The doctor came six to eight times a day. "The ladies of Stowey also visited me and wept over this little victim, affected by my complaints, and the miserable plight of the child," Sara wrote. "What I felt is impossible to write ? I had no husband to comfort me and share my grief ? perhaps the boy would die and he far away! All the responsibility of the infant?s life was upon me, and it was weight that dragged me to the earth!"

As the babe grew better, he once again wished to nurse, the consequence being that Sara got pustules on her breast which, she wrote, "swelled as big as walnuts and I could not endure him to touch me ? James Cole?s wife kindly undertook to suckle him by day, and by night we had recourse to a glass tube through which he sucked cow?s milk, tho? very reluctantly, and only when his eyes were shut."

STC?s response was, "When I read of the danger and the agony ? My dear Sara! ? my love! My Wife! ? God bless you & preserve us ? My Wife, believe and know that I plan to be home with you."

After the babe recovered from small pox and regained his former beauty, he developed consumption, and Sara had to witness her baby?s slow death. Little Berkeley, who was 14 weeks old when his father left, died at the age of 9 months on Feb. 10, 1799. The ordeal Sara endured robbed her of her once-beautiful hair. She wore a wig for the rest of her life.

In conveying the news of the baby?s death, she wrote her husband, "I am his Mother, and have carried him in my arms and have fed him at my bosom, and have watched over him by day and night for nine months; I have seen him twice at the brink of the grave but he has returned, and recovered and smiled upon me like an angel ? and now I am lamenting that he is gone.?

Sara expected her husband, upon hearing of Berkeley?s death, would be restored to her in May, but he did not hurry home. In fact, his letter to her ? lamenting death and commenting on the doctrines of Priestley ? was not comforting. He took a walking tour in Germany before coming home, arriving in England in late July.

Shortly thereafter he took a job as a political writer for the Morning News in London, and Sara and Hartley joined him there. But Coleridge never liked the city, nor did he care much for money, so soon thereafter he decided to return to the country. He wished to live near the Wordsworths in the Lake District. They began leasing a comfortable house, Greta Hall, in Keswick, Cumberland. The newly built house was large, fully furnished, and presented fine views of mountains and Lake Derwent. Their landlord, Mr. Jackson, lived in the "back house." The Wordsworths were 14 miles away at Dove Cottage.

Sara gave birth to their son, Derwent, on September 14, 1800. He was named after the nearby lake.

As winter set in and STC all too frequently made the trek to Dove Cottage on foot, he began to experience his old health complaints: stomach irritations, bowel attacks and rheumatism which STC termed the "flying gout." This, of course, necessitated more opium. With this came optical hallucinations and nightmares.

Since he was incapable of writing and since they owed money to almost all their friends, they descended once more into poverty. Meals were frugal. Rooms were cold and fireless because of lack of money for candles and coal.

The deeper he descended into his morphine mire, the more he irrationally perceived malice toward his wife. Dorothy Wordsworth, most especially, maligned Sara.

Within a year of moving to Greta Hall, the Coleridge marriage was destroyed. STC now spoke harshly of Sara, blaming everything wrong in his life on his wife. When he spoke to others, he spoke of her with contempt. Sara was quick with her hot temper, and she was becoming intolerant of his opium use. That she was no longer sympathetic when he took to his couch he perceived as proof that she did not care for him or his health.

Not understanding his "opium habit," the Wordsworths urged him to leave Sara. By this time Wordsworth had married Mary Hutchinson. A frequent visitor to Dove Cottage was Mary?s sister, Sarah Hutchinson, with whom STC now fancied himself in love. Sarah Hutchinson was very short ? not over five feet ? plump, and plain of face with a pointed chin. Other than offering him sympathy, she did not encourage Coleridge?s advances. Nevertheless, irrational from prolonged and heavy opium use, he fixated on her for the next decade, writing poems to his mythical "Asra,"a name used to disguise Miss Hutchinson?s true identity. Wife Sara was well aware of her husband?s infatuation and of their own estrangement.

But after many months of estrangement?and with coaxing from Southey (now married to Sara?s sister Edith), STC agreed to try to reclaim his marriage on the condition that his wife be more sympathetic to him and less abrasive. This she agreed to.

Sara once again got pregnant and would give birth to their only daughter, Sara. But once again she would give birth without her husband at her side.

Blaming his rheumatism on the cold climate, STC was determined to winter in a warmer climate. During his absence he wrote her, "God love you & have you in his keeping, My blessed Sara! ? & speedily restore me to you. ? I have faith, a heavenly Faith, that our future Days will be Days of Peace & affectionate Happiness. O that I were now with you! I feel it very, very hard to be from you at this trying time ? I dare not think a moment concerning you in this Relation, or I should be immediately ill. But I shall soon return ? and bring you back a confident & affectionate Husband. Again, and again, my dearest dearest Sara! ? my Wife & my Love, & indeed my very Hope/May God preserve you."

STC?s initial plan to go to Italy with Thomas Wedgewood did not come to fruition; he returned to Greta Hall shortly after little Sara?s birth and remained there ? mostly sick ? for the next year. Convinced of his imminent death, Coleridge decided he must go to Malta to restore his health and to hopefully kick his opium habit. Sara, the only person who fully understood her husband?s addiction, was in favor of this plan. The knowledge of his addiction was something they shared, a confidence Sara never betrayed. This must be what STC was speaking of when he wrote her, "In one thing, my deal Love! I do prefer you to any woman I ever knew ? I have the most unbounded confidence in your discretion."

Before he left for Malta, STC took out a life insurance policy for one thousand pounds, agreed to split the Wedgwood annuity fifty/fifty with his wife, and urged Southey and Edith to come live at Greta Hall, where Southey could be a "stand-in" parent to the three Coleridge children.

STC would not return to Greta Hall for 20 months, during which time his opium habit worsened. When he did return he abruptly announced his decision to separate from Sara and take the boys to live with him and the Wordsworths.

Sara put up a good fight. She begged to know why he wished to live separately from her, and all he could repeatedly say was she was "unfit." He was taking away her marital respectability, her sons, and she was skeptical that once he was gone he would continue to provide for her and their daughter. Eventually, with Southey?s influence, an amicable separation was agreed to. Since Derwent was but six, he stayed with his mother.

Writing to his brother about the separation, STC laid all the blame on Sara: ? "Mrs. Coleridge has a temper & general tone of feeling which after a long (and) patient trial I have found wholly incompatible with even an enduring life, & such as to preclude all chance of my ever developing the talents which my Maker has entrusted to me ? The few friends who have been Witnesses of my domestic life have long advised separation as the necessary condition of every thing desirable for me ? nor does Mrs. Coleridge herself state or pretend to any objection on the score of attachment to me; that will not look respectable for her, is the sum into which all her objections resolve themselves."

Coleridge?s brother scolded him thoroughly.

Once STC began to reside with the Wordsworths they were to discover the extent of his opium habit, a state that Southey had described thusly: ? "His habits are so murderous of all domestic comfort that I am only surprised Mrs. C. Is not rejoiced at being rid of him."

Since the Wordsworths had outgrown Dove Cottage, STC suggested they come to live at Greta Hall because he thought the Southeys would be leaving. This would, in effect, leave Sara homeless. Southey came to her rescue by informing STC he had no intentions of quitting Greta Hall. (He in fact lived there the rest of his life.)

The boys would come to spend their weekends with their father at the Wordsworths? Allan Bank and their vacations with their mother at Greta Hall. All three children were more comfortable at Greta Hall.

Approximately three years after leaving Sara, STC informed Sara he would like to come and stay with her and their daughter for a while. Southey exploded. He would not have Coleridge under his roof. At this time the landlord who lived in the back of the house died, and Sara was able to move into that portion of the house, so STC would be free to come and go without disturbing the Southeys. Sara?s correspondence from her husband at this time is marked with "My dear Love," an endearment he had not used in years.

They spent the next five months together and got along well. He never explained why he left the Wordsworths, but Dorothy Wordsworth?s word tell it all: "I know that he (STC) has not written a single line ? We have no hope of him ? his whole time and thoughts ? are employed in deceiving himself and seeking to deceive others ? This Habit pervades all his words and actions ? It has been misery, God knows, to me to see the truths which I now see."

After five months of domestic harmony but regression into his opium fog, Coleridge vowed to seek help with his "bad habit." He discussed going to an asylum in Scotland and going to London with the Montagues (whom Wordsworth warned against taking in STC), and ended up for a time with the Morgans in Hammersmith. At first he corresponded regularly and affectionately with his wife, then his old patterns reemerged and she would not hear from him for months. At this time Josiah Wedgwood withdrew his half of the Coleridge annuity, putting the Coleridge?s in dire financial straits.

With Hartley approaching college age, all Sara?s pleas to her husband to provide for their son?s education landed on deaf ears. In deep opium crisis, STC was unable to write or lecture or do anything to earn the money his family needed. It fell to his distant brothers to procure for Hartley the equivalent of a scholarship worth fifty pounds a year. This was supplemented with 40 pounds per annum from his brothers, 30 pounds per annum from Lady Beaumont, ten pounds from Poole, and 5 pounds from Cottle, the printer who published STC?s verses. Similarly, when Derwent was of university age, an old Coleridge admirer, John Hookam Frere, set aside 300 pounds for his education, and Lady Beaumont also offered assistance. It was said the Coleridge children were left to "chance and charity."

STC had not only failed Sara, he failed his children, too. But Sara never maligned her husband. She took his side in all disputes (including the rift with the Wordsworths) and encouraged his sons to respect the father who had abandoned them.

For several years Sara had no communication from her husband, nor did she receive financial support. She was beholden to her brother-in-law (Southey) for allowing her to live in Greta Hall, now his house. In appreciation, she taught in the Southey schoolroom. At this time the Southey family included three adolescent girls and two children. In this schoolroom Sara?s sister Mary (Mrs. Lovell) taught English and Latin; Sara taught French, Italian, writing, arithmetic and needlework; Southey taught Greek and Spanish; and a neighbor taught drawing and music. (Southey?s wife, Edith, was suffering from depression.) School was held from half past nine each morning until four, with an hour for walking and a half hour for dressing.

As Sara?s children grew into adulthood, her worries for them grew. "I hope no child of mine will marry without a good certainty of supporting a family," she said. "I have known many difficulties myself that I have reason to warn my children."

Hartley ? as the other Coleridges ? was to prove a promising scholar, a fact that delighted his father. However, during a later fellowship at Cambridge?s Oriel College, he was denied membership as a fellow, chiefly due to his "sottishness."

Sara ? and her husband ? were outraged, blaming everyone but Hartley. Sara wished to bring her firstborn back into the fold at Greta Hall, but Southey prohibited it. This was a low point of Sara?s life. She wrote that she felt like "one without plan or purpose; without hope or heart."

She had good reason to grieve. Her son fell deeper into alcoholism, had no home, and was given to "wandering." Through the Wordsworths she would scrape together money to send him for the rest of her life.

After 29 years she would leave Greta Hall and experience a modicum of happiness, living first with Derwent when he took orders, then coming to settle permanently with Sara when she delivered her first child in 1830. A reputed scholar, Sara the younger had married STC?s nephew, Henry Coleridge, who became a lawyer in London?s Hampstead. (The Coleridge cousins had not met until they were adults.)

Ironically, Hampstead was just a few short miles from Highgate, where since 1816 Coleridge had been living with surgeon and apothecary James Gillman, who controlled his opium habit.

Sara and STC met for the first time in eight years. Before that, there had been a ten-year gap between their meetings. STC was proud of his nephew/son-in-law, and he and Sara were doting grandparents. Coleridge was to write of Sara: ? "In fact, barring living in the same house with her there are few women that I have a greater respect and ratherish liking for, than Mrs. C."

For the last three years of Coleridge?s life, he and Sara enjoyed many cordial visits with each other. STC died in 1833, at age 61. Sara, who was two years older than her husband, lived until 1845.

Sources: The Bondage of Love, by Molly Lefebure; Coleridge, The Viking Portable Library.


? 2012 Cheryl Bolen
Posted at The Beau Monde by permission of the author.

Source: http://main.thebeaumonde.com/archives/4755?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sara-coleridge-wife-of-an-opium-eater-by-cheryl-bolen

rodney king Webb Simpson Fathers Day Quotes Stevie J mothers day 2012 cinco de mayo osama bin laden death

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Aspirin's impact on colorectal cancer | Harvard Gazette

Aspirin therapy can extend the life of colorectal cancer patients whose tumors carry a mutation in a key gene, but it has no effect on patients who lack the mutation, Harvard-affiliated Dana-Farber Cancer Institute scientists report in the Oct. 25 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

In a study involving more than 900 patients with colorectal cancer, the researchers found that, for patients whose tumors harbored a mutation in the gene PIK3CA, aspirin use produced a sharp jump in survival: five years after diagnosis, 97 percent of those taking aspirin were still alive, compared with 74 percent of those not using aspirin. By contrast, aspirin had no impact on five-year survival rates among patients without a PIK3CA mutation.

?Our results suggest that aspirin can be particularly effective in prolonging survival among patients whose colorectal cancer tests positive for a mutation in PIK3CA,? said the study?s senior author, Shuji Ogino of Dana-Farber, Brigham and Women?s Hospital, and the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH). ?For the first time, we have a genetic marker that can help doctors determine which colorectal cancers are likely to respond to a particular therapy.? He cautions that the results need to be replicated by other researchers before they can be considered definitive.

While aspirin is often prescribed for colorectal cancer patients, doctors haven?t been able to predict which patients will actually benefit from the treatment. The new finding suggests that the survival benefit is limited to the 20 percent whose tumors have the PIK3CA mutation.

?For the first time, we have a genetic marker that can help doctors determine which colorectal cancers are likely to respond to a particular therapy,? said Ogino. Photo by Sam Ogden/DFCI Staff Photographer

For the remaining patients, aspirin may still be used, but it is likely to be much less effective and can sometimes lead to gastrointestinal ulcers and stomach bleeding.

The study was prompted by previous research that suggested that aspirin blocks an enzyme called PTGS2 (cyclooxygenase-2), causing a slowdown in the signaling activity of another enzyme, PI3K. That led researchers to hypothesize that aspirin could be especially effective against colorectal cancers in which the PIK3CA gene is mutated.

To conduct the study, investigators obtained data on 964 patients with rectal or colon cancer from the Nurses? Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study ? long-term tracking studies of the health of tens of thousands of people. The data included information on the patients? use of aspirin after diagnosis and the presence or absence of PIK3CA mutations in their tumor tissue.

The study, which combines research into disease-related genes and large populations of individuals, represents a new, hybrid field that Ogino has termed ?molecular pathology epidemiology.? ?The field may help us bring together information from two frontiers of cancer research ? at both the molecular and population levels ? in ways that are beneficial to patients,? said Ogino, who is an associate professor in the Department of Epidemiology at HSPH.

The study was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Bennett Family Fund for Targeted Therapies Research, the Entertainment Industry Foundation through the National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance, the Frank Knox Memorial Fellowship at Harvard University, and a Damon Runyon Clinical Investigator Award.

The lead author of the study is HMS research fellow in medicine? Xiaoyun Liao of Dana-Farber.

Source: http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/10/aspirins-impact-on-colorectal-cancer/

hot wings recipe 7 layer dip recipe chris carter superbowl 2012 kickoff time what time is the super bowl 2012 nfl mvp lana del rey snl performance

NCAA Women?s Hockey: Week 4 Recap

Current Rankings (Week 5):

  1. Minnesota
  2. Cornell
  3. North Dakota
  4. Boston University
  5. Boston College
  6. Minnesota-Duluth
  7. Wisconsin
  8. Harvard
  9. Clarkson
  10. Northeastern

Match-up of the Week:?Minnesota 7, Ohio State 2 (10/19); Minnesota 8, Ohio State 0 (10/20)

The Gophers kept on rolling this weekend with two dominating victories against Ohio State. It was really the first time this year that the Buckeyes could muster up no consistent offense at even-strength; the only two goals they scored were a 5-on-3 power play goal and a 4-on-3 power play goal. With both games combined, Ohio State was outshot 83-37. The series was definitely a step back for the Buckeyes, but their key players will need to re-group quickly in order to help right the ship.

Other than the first period on Saturday, when the play was more back-and-forth, Minnesota was largely in control of every minute of this series. Amanda Kessel can?t seem to stop scoring, and her supporting cast of Hannah Brandt, Maryanne Menefee, Kelly Terry, Sarah Davis, and Rachael Bona has provided plenty of production so far as well. Goaltender Noora R?ty has had the answer almost every time she?s been tested this season. Megan Bozek, Mira Jalosuo, and Rachel Ramsey have been phenomenal on defense. It was a special weekend for Bozek in particular as she notched her 100th career point, with an assist on the Gophers? fifth goal Friday night. Minnesota is just really flying high right now and it?s going to take a huge effort by any team to slow them down.

Other Notes

Cornell is off to a solid start, after splitting their series with Boston University over the weekend and defeating St. Lawrence Tuesday night. They were less than inspiring in their 5-1 defeat at the hands of the Terriers, but they put on dominating performances in a 5-2 win over BU and a 5-1 win over St. Lawrence. It?s early in their season, but so far Big Red looks like they?re going to be a powerhouse offensively and very strong defensively.

Boston University also looks very good so far this year. They responded well to their first loss of the year against Cornell, taking the second game of the series 5-1. Marie-Philip Poulin finally got on the board herself this weekend, scoring three goals in the two games. Isabel Menard exploded for two goals and two assists in the second tilt. The Terriers? offense proved that they can skate with almost anyone in the country; their ability to score goals will be an important part of their success this year.

North Dakota earned their first sweep of the year with 3-1 and 1-0 victories over St. Cloud State. It looks like UND is starting to piece things together; they still haven?t piled on the goals in any game this year, but they?re showing much more consistent offense, compared to that first game a few weeks ago against Minnesota State. They?re also still awaiting the return of star forward Michelle Karvinen to the line-up. Freshman Becca Kohler had a nice weekend, scoring her first collegiate goal in the first game and then adding an assist on Jocelyne Lamoureux?s game-winner the next day. Jorid Dagfinrud wasn?t spectacular in net, but she didn?t have to be. She looked solid anyway, giving up one goal on Friday and then posting a 19-save shutout on Saturday.

Boston College suffered an upset on the road against New Hampshire on Saturday, losing 4-3 after giving up a 3-1 lead. They bounced back at home the next afternoon with a 5-2 win. I think the Eagles still have a long way to go in terms of putting things together and reaching their potential as a team. They just haven?t been very consistent in either their offensive or defensive play, and they?re still looking for either Corinne Boyles or Megan Miller to make a strong bid for the starting job. Boston College has a glutton of talented young players, and there?s still reason to believe that they will become a better team as those players gain more experience, but their lack of consistent assertiveness so far is concerning.

It was not the kind of weekend Minnesota-Duluth wanted to have. They tied Minnesota State 3-3 on Friday night, losing the ensuing shootout 2-1, and then fell to the Mavericks 1-0 the following afternoon. The Bulldogs had the upper hand in both games when it came to shots on goal and pretty much outplayed Minnesota State in both contests. However, they still made some critical mistakes at crucial points in the game. They gave up a three-goal third period lead and allowed the Mavericks to score twice in the final minute and a half on Friday to tie it. Special teams are definitely what UMD needs to address, as both of those goals given up in the final 90 ticks were extra attacker goals, and they also only went 1-for-8 on the power play on the weekend.

Wisconsin?s performance against Bemidji State this weekend was less than spectacular, to say the least. They were shut out for the third game in a row when the Beavers defeated them 1-0 Friday night. The Badgers put forth a much better effort on Sunday, but they just could not close it out as Bemidji State tied it at 3 with less than a minute remaining in regulation (Wisconsin ended up winning the shootout 2-0). Wisconsin?s inability to score goals and put together threatening offensive pressure on a game-to-game basis is proving to be a huge problem.

Although they were dropped from my rankings for a few weeks, I think Clarkson has looked good enough so far this year to warrant being bumped up to the #9 slot. This weekend they split their series with Mercyhurst, winning 3-0 and losing 4-3. I?m much lower on the Lakers than most others, but it was still a good test for the Golden Knights, who answered the call pretty well. Forward Jamie Lee Rattray has led the way offensively for Clarkson so far, while freshman defender Erin Ambrose has been a near-revelation so far on the blue line. Erica Howe has been very good in net this season, and she had the shutout on Friday night, making 36 saves in the process.

Stars of the Week

1. Amanda Kessel, Junior, Forward, Minnesota: Had four goals and three assists in the Gophers? series versus Ohio State and has showed no signs of slowing down this year.

2. Tracy McCann, Junior, Forward, Minnesota State: Posted two goals and two assists in the Mavericks? series against Minnesota-Duluth, including the gamewinner in their 1-0 victory. She also had the shootout winner to help them earn the extra point over the Bulldogs in their 3-3 tie.

3. Brianne Jenner, Junior, Forward, Cornell: She was decent on the ice this week, scoring a goal and three assists in three games, but she was most impressive off the ice. She announced that this season, she will be fundraising for a 7-year-old suffering from brain cancer. She is looking for sponsors to donate $1 for every goal she scores.

Tags: Amanda Kessel, Becca Kohler, Boston College, Boston University, Brianne Jenner, Clarkson, Corinne Boyles, Cornell, Erica Howe, Erin Ambrose, Hannah Brandt, Harvard, Isabel Menard, Jamie Lee Rattray, Jocelyne Lamoureux, Jorid Dagfinrud, Kelly Terry, Marie-Philip Poulin, Maryanne Menefee, Megan Bozek, Megan Miller, Mercyhurst, Michelle Karvinen, Minnesota, Minnesota State, Minnesota-Duluth, Mira Jalosuo, Noora Raty, North Dakota, Northeastern, Rachael Bona, Rachel Ramsey, Sarah Davis, Tracy McCann, Wisconsin

Category: Women's Hockey

Source: http://thehockeywriters.com/ncaa-womens-hockey-week-4-recap/

slither naacp glen campbell jerusalem artichoke bud shootout aretha franklin stevie wonder

Reading 'Gone with the Wind' in Pyongyang

PYONGYANG, North Korea (AP) ? The former black marketeer has read it. So has the beautiful young librarian, and the aging philosophy professor who has spent his life teaching the ruling doctrine of this isolated outpost of totalitarian socialism. At times it seems as if everyone in Pyongyang, a city full of monuments to its own mythology, has read the book.

In it they found a tortured love story, or a parable of bourgeois decline. Many found heroes. They lost themselves in the story of a nation divided by war, its defeated cities reduced to smolder and ruins, its humbled aristocrats reduced to starvation.

The book is "Gone With the Wind."

To come across Margaret Mitchell's 1936 Civil War epic in North Korea is to stumble over the unlikeliest of American cultural touchstones in the unlikeliest of places.

What does antebellum plantation life have to do with North Korea, where three generations of rulers ? grandfather, father and now the young son, Kim Jong Un ? have been worshipped as omniscient? What appeal does Scarlett O'Hara's high-society ruthlessness hold for people only a few years past a horrific famine?

And yet here, in a country thought to have the world's tightest censorship net, a place where the literary culture was largely inherited from Joseph Stalin, the government has published a novel that longs for the days of the slave-owning American South.

Maybe the explanation is in Mitchell's own words.

"They had known war and terror and hunger, had seen dear ones dead before their times," Mitchell writes of postwar southerners. "They had hungered and been ragged and lived with the wolf at the door. And they had rebuilt fortune from ruin."

In "Gone With the Wind," North Koreans found echoes of their own history and insights into the United States: bloody civil wars fought nearly a century apart; two cities ? Atlanta and Pyongyang ? reduced to rubble after attacks by U.S. forces; two cultures that still celebrate the way they stood up to the Yankees. If North Koreans have yet to find fortune, they haven't given up.

"In North Korea only the strong survive," said the onetime black marketeer, a former salesman of used televisions who spent much of his life in Pyongyang but who eventually escaped to South Korea. "That's the most compelling message of the novel."

Perhaps more than anything, though, North Koreans found what readers everywhere ask of a good novel: an escape and a comfort. And in a country with little in the way of entertainment, a police state that keeps the entire population relentlessly on edge, Mitchell's well-told (if relentlessly soapy) tale of lost love, mansion life, war and honor became an important refuge.

Ambitious young North Korean women, raised amid deeply entrenched sexism, find inspiration in Scarlett's rise from ruin. Men revel in the muscularity of her swashbuckling love, Rhett Butler. People struggling with a lack of heat in winter, or political infighting, or the everyday pain of a marriage gone to hell can disappear into Mitchell's story

It also moved into official life. The movie, forbidden to the general public but beloved by the former dictator and movie buff, Kim Jong Il, is sometimes used in English-language programs to train elite government officials. North Korean negotiators meeting with U.S. envoys would occasionally quote from it, once replying to American criticism with the quote (which perfectionists might note is slightly off from the book and the movie): "Frankly, Scarlett, I don't give a damn."

Ask around in this capital city, an enclave of North Korea's educated elite, and nearly everyone has something to say about it.

"Scarlett is a strong woman," said Pak Su Mi, a twenty-something guide at Pyongyang's main library, The Grand People's Study House, a maze of house-sized rooms lit by stuttering fluorescent lights where the smell of mildew often hangs heavily.

In a country where women's fashions were long frozen in Soviet-style dowdiness, men watched intently as Pak strode through the library in her tight skirt, heels clacking on the concrete floors. "But the triangle relationship between Scarlett, Rhett Butler and Ashley, I didn't like that," she said.

The games that Scarlett learned in the whirl of plantation life ? to toy with men, to hide her intelligence, to dangle her sexuality ? reinforced the worst American stereotypes.

"I have to be loyal to my man, not be thinking of another man," Pak said.

Guides at places like the Study House are groomed to interact with foreigners, and are well-versed sliding propaganda into conversations. Pak didn't miss her chance.

"In my country," she noted, pressing a button for the elevator, "the woman is more important in relationships."

"Gone With the Wind" is one of the best-selling novels in modern history, and remains a talisman in the American South, where Mitchell's vision of a lost aristocracy often pushes aside the complexities of Civil War history. It still sells about 50,000 copies worldwide every year, according to its publisher, Scribner.

When it was released, though, it sold copies by the million. It was popular from England to Nazi Germany to imperial Japan, which then occupied the entire Korean peninsula.

The book, which the Japanese probably brought to Korea in the 1930s, is thought to have largely disappeared from here by the end of the 1950-1953 Korean War. By then, the peninsula was firmly divided, many cities were shattered, and North Korea's founder, Kim Il Sung, was building a Stalinist police state.

When the government suddenly ordered it translated and released in the mid-1990s, a time when North Korea's all-important Soviet support had disappeared and famine was looming, it swept like a literary firestorm through Pyongyang. The book scene here has long been dominated by detective stories and romance novels riven with heavy-handed propaganda, and classic foreign novels like "Don Quixote."

"For a while, you couldn't have a conversation without talking about 'Gone With the Wind,'" said the former Pyongyang TV trader, who spoke on condition he not be identified, fearing repercussions against relatives still living in the North.

Why it was published, though, remains unclear.

While Washington and Pyongyang are still technically at war, and hatred for the United States government is a constant in North Korean propaganda, American culture has always been quietly popular here. There are North Korean fans of everything from Mark Twain's short stories to bootleg Schwarzenegger movies.

Some believe the decision to publish "Gone With the Wind" was meant as a symbolic peace offering from North Korea to the United States ? the two nations have sparred for years over Pyongyang's nuclear program. Others see it as an attempt by the government to teach its people about American culture, or at least Mitchell's version of that culture.

Or perhaps it was an insult. "Gone With the Wind" is, in many ways, a celebration of how North Korea sees its own history: as a small, honorable nation that stood up to Washington.

"Mitchell's depiction of U.S. soldiers as lecherous marauders is also a good fit with North Korean propaganda," B.R. Myers, a North Korea scholar and professor at South Korea's Dongseo University, said in an email.

Its popularity, though, has little to do with politics.

"The book is about the normal lives of the American people, so it does nothing to help me understand American policy of today," said Song Chol, a 63-year-old professor who has spent much of his life studying "juche," the North Korean philosophy of self-reliance that is quasi-religious dogma here.

"I read it a long time ago," Song then growled, making clear that additional questions should be on juche.

Like Mitchell's postwar southerners, North Koreans know about living through terrible times.

Over 1 million North Koreans are thought to have died in the Korean War, and hundreds of thousands more in the mid-1990s famine. Rights activists say more than 100,000 people are held in political prisons. Poverty is the norm.

The economy has improved for some over the past couple of years, and there are now a handful of rich North Koreans who can buy BMWs and flat-screen TVs.

But most people barely get by. They earn a few dollars a month, and count themselves lucky if they own a bicycle. They are tough people, who endure North Korea's brutal winters in thin cotton overcoats, plow fields with wooden farm tools and make ends meet by selling dumplings or laundry detergent in street markets.

"The weak perish in 'Gone With the Wind,' said the former black marketeer. "That is something that North Koreans understand."

___

Follow Tim Sullivan on Twitter at http://twitter.com/SullivanTimAP.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/reading-gone-wind-pyongyang-051805626.html

charlie st cloud celtics josh hamilton nba playoffs rosario dawson young jeezy world wildlife fund

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

World Starting To See Big Bargains In Chinese Stocks

Tourists from mainland China visit a jewellery...

Tourists from mainland China visit a jeweler in Hong Kong?

With negative sentiment toward China reaching an extreme in recent months, patient investors have been rewarded with recent news of improving data from the Asian giant.

CLSA Sinology?s Andy Rothman reported that in September, retail sales growth rose 13.2 percent, which was the fastest pace of the year. Real urban disposable income grew nearly 10 percent and real rural disposable income rose more than 12 percent during the first three quarters of the year. And, while export numbers are weak, China has ?so far avoided the large-scale export-sector layoffs that led to 2009?s massive stimulus,? says Andy.

There was strength in commodity imports, too. Copper imports into China increased 11 percent compared to the previous month due to increased demand from power infrastructure, white goods restocking and auto production. Iron ore rose a modest 4 percent compared to the previous month, which is encouraging. There was also a sharp rebound in oil imports most likely due to holiday restocking and lower international prices. In fact, Pareto Securities found that Chinese implied oil demand came in at an all-time high of 9.8 million barrels per day in September.

Chinese Implied Oil Demand as All-Time High

The markets also saw an increase in fixed asset investment, a measure of capital spending, which grew at ?the fastest pace since October 2011,? says CLSA. According to Credit Suisse, ?a surge in transportation spending in the month of September [is] starting to reflect the project approvals for highway, rail, airport, and metropolitan transport projects announced in May and June.?

While Credit Suisse says FAI growth was boosted by government investment stimulus, CLSA also notes that fixed asset investment and capital spending by private firms has been rising faster than state-owned firms for 30 of the last 31 months.

Money supply, a key lubricant of the economy and markets, also continued to increase, and this has historically driven Chinese equities. Take a look at the chart below, which shows the year-over-year money supply compared to the MSCI China Index over the past decade. Over the past 10 years, after the supply in money bottomed, stocks soon rebounded.

On January 31, 2012, money supply hit a near decade low of 12.4 percent year-over-year growth. Since then, the number has been creeping higher, rising sharply to 14.8 percent in September, and shortly thereafter, equities responded.

Money Supply Growth Bullish for Chinese <span class=

The Wall Street Journal recognized the improvement in Asian stocks and investor sentiment recently, suggesting that the ?region?s economy could be nearing the end of a slowdown.? I?ve been trying to temper investors? expectations of China as weak economic data caused investors to be skittish, telling Investor Alert readers that it wasn?t the time to be bearish. Now, ?if the Chinese economy shows sustained signs of stabilizing, it would remove a major overhang of worry for investors in Asia, and may spur more capital raising and other deals as investors become confident enough to switch money out of bonds and back into equity markets,? says The Journal.

Forbes Dividend Stock Daily serves up fresh dividend picks every trading day.? Average yield of recommended stocks, REITs and MLPs is 6%. Click here for a special membership offer from Steve Forbes.

This appears to be a good time to be investing in China, as stocks are historically cheap. At the beginning of October, BCA noted that there was a ?prevailing pessimism? around China and that the stocks were ?currently trading at hefty discounts to world averages and even to euro zone stocks.? The firm indicated that Chinese shares had a forward price-to-earnings ratio of below 9 times; the world and U.S. benchmarks traded at 12 and 13 times, respectively.

Chinese <span class=Chinese stocks are also cheap compared to emerging markets. In 2007, China traded at a 75 percent premium to emerging markets. Today, Chinese stocks trade at a 20 percent discount. If you look at a comparison of price-to-earnings in China to those in emerging markets, you have to go back to 2006 to find that ratio as low as it is today.

The low price-to-earnings indicates to me that the negativity pendulum has swung too far. ?Investors have turned from euphoria at the height of the ?China mania? five years ago to extreme pessimism,? says BCA.

Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2012/10/22/world-starting-to-see-big-bargains-in-chinese-stocks/

college football ncaa football brian van gorder blazing saddles lsu alabama lsu game lsu game

Teen recalls at trial sex with ex-NY Giant Taylor

Former New York Giants linebacker Lawrence Taylor leaves federal court Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2012, in New York. A teenager who has accused Taylor of sexually assaulting her when she was 16 cried as she described her encounter with the NFL Hall of Famer at the start of a civil trial. Taylor has pleaded guilty to having sex with her in 2010. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)

Former New York Giants linebacker Lawrence Taylor leaves federal court Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2012, in New York. A teenager who has accused Taylor of sexually assaulting her when she was 16 cried as she described her encounter with the NFL Hall of Famer at the start of a civil trial. Taylor has pleaded guilty to having sex with her in 2010. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)

Former New York Giants linebacker Lawrence Taylor leaves federal court Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2012, in New York. A teenager who has accused Taylor of sexually assaulting her when she was 16 cried as she described her encounter with the NFL Hall of Famer, at the start of a civil trial. Taylor has pleaded guilty to having sex with her in 2010. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)

NEW YORK (AP) ? A teenager who has accused former New York Giants linebacker Lawrence Taylor of sexually assaulting her when she was 16 cried Tuesday as she described her encounter with the NFL Hall of Famer at the start of a civil trial.

Taylor pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of sexual misconduct and patronizing an underage prostitute for having sex with her in 2010 and is serving six years of probation. He leaned forward in his chair to watch the 19-year-old testify in U.S. District Court.

The teen, Cristina Fierro, who has since married, told a Manhattan jury hearing her lawsuit that she didn't know who Taylor was when she found him naked on a bed in a hotel room in Montebello, just north of New York City. She says another man forced her to have sex with Taylor for $300. She said she brought the lawsuit to hold Taylor accountable.

The Brooklyn-born Fierro, who grew up in Pennsylvania and New York, began weeping as she graphically described her meeting with Taylor, who says he believed she was 19 at the time.

"He said I had nice curly hair like his wife," Fierro recalled.

She said he told her she was pretty as he massaged her after she turned her back to him.

Fierro said she went to a bathroom to call her uncle, who told her to dial 911. She said she did so and left the phone in her bag, "waiting for shadows to come and banging on the door to come get me." But the police never showed up.

She said Taylor, who played in the NFL for 13 seasons and won two Super Bowls, got on top of her and she squirmed and tried to push him away but it "felt like I wasn't making a difference because of how big he was compared to me."

She said she told him it was her "first time" and he replied, "Just relax."

"It was really rough and painful," she testified, saying she felt suicidal several months later and began taking medication for depression, insomnia and anxiety.

Fierro testified that when the sex was over Taylor "just pulled out money and said, 'Here, can you turn the TV off on your way out?'"

When she returned to the car of the man who had ordered her to have sex with Taylor, she said, she called her uncle and told him in Spanish that calling 911 didn't work. The police were waiting when the car arrived back at the man's Bronx home. The man later was sentenced to seven years in prison.

Taylor's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, said in his opening statement that Taylor never used violence, never threatened Fierro and thought she was sent by a friend who offered "female companionship."

Aidala tried to mitigate the circumstances by noting that Taylor "did have sex with a woman who was 16 years, 11 months and three weeks old."

"I am not condoning what he did," Aidala said. "It's a crime he's been punished for."

He said the lawsuit, seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, is "a money grab" because of Taylor's fame.

With cross-examination set to start Wednesday, Aidala asked the judge if he could tell the jury that a rape kit test showed the semen of two men including Taylor. The judge didn't immediately decide.

Taylor, who lives in Broward County, Fla., led the Giants to Super Bowl titles in 1987 and 1991. He was elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame and the NFL's 75th Anniversary All-Time Team. He was expected to testify Wednesday.

The Associated Press doesn't normally publish the names of accusers in sexual-assault cases unless they agree to be named or identify themselves publicly, as Fierro has done.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2012-10-23-Lawrence%20Taylor-Lawsuit/id-eb210c22dd6a434d8385991cf0815c0f

carlos zambrano clemson pellet gun clay aiken zambrano orange bowl tim howard goal

6 Nominees Who Famously Criticized the Oscars | Film School Rejects

Culture Warrior

Criticizing the Academy Awards is becoming a tradition as solidified as the Awards ceremony itself. The ink spilled over anticipation of who will come out swinging during Awards season is typically followed by an anticipated ? but, when well-argued, often necessary ? critique of the pomp and circumstance of the ceremony itself. Now that we?re neck-deep in Presidential election season, the time dedicated to polling, statistics, and manufactured drama all in the service of something ultimately unpredictable resonates alongside the earliest Fall predictions of the Winter?s Awards competitors: no matter the race, we can become hopelessly invested in every detail in the process of competition. As Matt Taibbi stated bluntly in an editorial on the Presidential race, this is not what democratic participation should look or feel like. Nor, for that matter, is immersing oneself in the Kool-Aid of Oscar anticipation what a genuine investment in cinema should look like.

While I?ve bloviated more than enough on the Oscars, it?s something different entirely when someone who ostensibly stands to benefit from the institution itself to criticize it, as potential Best Actor nominee Joaquin Phoenix did recently. Perhaps criticizing the Oscars is not the bravest thing a wealthy famous person can do (perhaps), but the exact form that it takes is certainly worthy of attention because such instances evidence certain power relations and possibilities in Hollywood.

Why do some Hollywood figures participate in this criticism, and others don?t?

Dudley Nichols

In 1936, screenwriter Dudley Nichols was the first nominee to boycott the Academy Awards (the year that he won Best Writing for The Informer). Nichols?s boycott was expressed in support of the ongoing WGA strike. Of course, a similar strike nearly shut down the ceremony in 2008 as a result of solidarity expressed for unionized writers across many levels of Hollywood. While Nichols, who went on to pen Stagecoach and co-write Bringing Up Baby, would hopefully be proud that at the display of empathy that non-writer Hollywood figures gave to writers, the Hollywood screenwriter evidently still has a hard time making their way just above the line well after Nichols?s deliberate absence.

Nichols?s protest was politically circumstantial, not a sustained criticism of the ceremony or institution. As of 1949, after the writers? demands were negotiated and Nichols acquired several more nominations, Nichols was in possession of his 1936 Academy Award.

George C. Scott

George C. Scott became notorious for being the first famous actor publicized as openly critical of the Oscars, calling the ceremony a ?two-hour meat parade? (he?d surely be delighted to know the contemporary meat parade is more than an hour and a half longer). Scott declined his Best Supporting Actor nomination for The Hustler, but really turned heads when he refused to attend the ceremony that brought his Best Actor win for Patton in 1971 (when he made the famous ?meat parade? comment).

Scott was known for his discomfort with his own stardom as well as his sometimes-intimidating no-bullshit persona. Seemingly misplaced, Scott found success in an industry with bullshit as its stock-and-trade. Not only was Scott the archetype for the famous actor speaking out against the Oscar, but he also modeled the jokey, no-bullshit approach to criticism sometimes articulated by later stars.

Marlon Brando

Method actor Marlon Brando, who won an Oscar in 1955 for On the Waterfront, became politically involved with the American Indian Movement (AIM) during the many civil rights struggles of the early 1970s. Brando refused to attend the Awards ceremony in 1972, and sent Native American activist Sacheen Littlefeather to read a fifteen-page letter in protest that Brando had written. However, she was instructed by the producers to limit her comments to a one-minute speech. Perhaps no absence of an Award recipient is as notorious as this one. The political intents of the protest (against the treatment of Native Americans by the film industry ? did I mention Dudley Nichols wrote Stagecoach?) unfortunately became overshadowed by Brando?s increasingly eccentric public persona.

I haven?t found any information as to whether this public display helped the AIM gain recognition and support. As much as this incident plays into Brando?s late career narrative of theatricality and peculiarity, Native Americans are still virtually absent in Hollywood both on and off-screen after decades of negative representation, and whoever booed Littlefeather here looked like a bunch of assholes. When you watch the actual speech, it?s nowhere near as strange as the industry folklore developed around it ? which has attempted to mute any substance of the protests ? has remembered it to be.

After the protest, AMPAS declared that no future proxies could accept Academy Awards, even with the permission of the winner. The following year, when Brando received a nomination for Best Actor for Last Tango in Paris, he was once again absent.

Woody Allen

Though the prolific, eternal Hollywood staple Woody Allen refuses to attend the Academy Awards, this clearly never prevents him from receiving a nomination every 2-5 years. Allen made one exception to his consistent absence at the 2002 ceremony (in which he wasn?t nominated, thanks to Curse of the Jade Scorpion), when he gave a speech urging filmmakers to continue filming in a post-9/11 New York City. When asked about this rare appearance, Allen stated, ?I didn?t have to present anything. I didn?t have to accept anything. I just had to talk about New York City.? Allen?s decision seems to be mostly personal, as he hasn?t leveled much overt criticism at the Academy Awards.

Jean-Luc Godard

In 2010, French New Wave pioneer and current schizophrenic-media collage artist Jean-Luc Godard ? whose films had heretofore never been recognized by the Academy in any shape or form ? was announced as the recipient of a lifetime achievement award by AMPAS. Journalists and AMPAS members tried furiously for days to contact him by phone to see if he?d show up and accept, and Godard teased as to whether or not he would attend (he stated that one of the primary reasons he may not attend is because he can?t smoke on planes).

Godard ultimately did not receive or accept the Award by an industry that he at one point both revered and reviled, but the process leading up to Godard?s declaration made for the director?s most enjoyable and madcap Hollywood critique since Pierrot le fou.

Joaquin Phoenix

Past winner and nominee Joaquin Phoenix stated in response to speculation about his Oscar nomination, ?It?s a carrot, but it?s the worst-tasting carrot I?ve ever tasted in my whole life. I don?t want this carrot.? As judging by his recent career, the perpetually fascinating Phoenix (who, by the way, is indeed really, really good in The Master) clearly does not care too much if powers that be validate or approve his decisions, resulting thus far in one of the most interesting turns of an already variegated career.

The actor cited his experience as the subject of Awards buzz when he starred in Walk the Line as the source of his discomfort with the ceremony (could this have also inspired his years-long renunciation of Hollywood and staging of a breakdown?). Phoenix seems to be in full George C. Scott mode with a ?I-don?t-give-a-fuck? demeanor and colorful metaphors in tow, but what?s interesting is that Phoenix, like Scott, treats the ceremony as frivolous, while attempting no associated criticisms about potential negative ripple effects of the Awards-season-as-hype-machine on the craft of acting.

Final Thoughts

Probably the most immediately noticeable aspect of this list is that it?s composed entirely of white men and, with the exceptions of Nichols and Godard, movie stars. Though a lack of attendance did not bring evident repercussions on the likes of Brando or Woody Allen, I wonder if women and persons of color are reluctant to criticize the ceremony because quality Hollywood roles are difficult to find as is.

Secondly, with some exceptions, there seems to be a pattern of treating a frivolous ceremony with frivolity, and this is where Scott, Phoenix, and Godard are connected. Few criticisms are made outside the observation that the ceremony is silly, pompous, and unnecessary. Negative systemic effects about the quality of mainstream filmmaking or compromising the craft of acting aren?t mentioned, just a personal distaste.

Finally, even though the Academy Awards have been a television event for several decades (which probably contributes to some actors? sense of discomfiting self-aggrandizement), it?s unclear as to whether the speeches of the ceremony are a productive forum for activism, as the Nichols and Brando examples attest. In fact, the Awards have a more evident history of activism from people who actually went up to the podium.

Criticisms of the Academy Awards may be rare from potential recipients, but they?re also occasionally very rich (see: meat parade). However, the hardest thing for an industry to do is criticize itself from the inside. But that won?t stop me from wishing for a mass walkout led by Joaquin Phoenix holding a bag of carrots.

Eat More Culture Warrior Carrots

Source: http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/6-nominees-who-famously-criticized-the-oscars-lpalm.php

1940 census instagram for android dallas news dallas fort worth dfw 1930 census nike new nfl uniforms